Friday, April 30, 2010

Bridging the Online Language Barrier: Translating the Internet

Since its earliest days, the Internet filled us with the hope of uniting all of humanity. With information traveling at the speed of light, we thought, geographic location wouldn’t matter and anyone who shared our interests would be within reach.

But there’s an age-old problem working against our utopian dreams of the web uniting the world: the language barrier. After all, it doesn’t matter what you have access to if you can’t read it.

In the first couple decades of the Internet, we had a simple, if unsustainable, solution. Most people used English — even if it wasn’t their native language.

Ethan Zuckerman, the founder of the multi-lingual blog network Global Voices, observed this phenomenon as recently as 2004.  He was at dinner with a couple dozen bloggers in Amman, Jordan who were chatting away in Arabic.

“But almost all of them were blogging in English at that point,” Zuckerman explains. “Out of that group of people that I had dinner with, a lot of those people blog in Arabic now. And I’ve gone back and talked to some of them… and one said to me, ‘When we were trying this in 2004 there were very few Arabic speakers online, and we just couldn’t write for that audience. But now our friends, our peers, our neighbors are all online. That’s who we want to reach.’”

The numbers support this anecdote. According to Internet World Stats, Arabic users on the Internet have increased by more than 2,000 percent over the past decade. Chinese will soon replace English as the most-used language on the web. And dozens of other languages are experiencing huge growth. On the one hand this is great:  the more people who come online, the better. But as they join the web using different languages, how do we stop the internet from fracturing along language lines?

Many think a big part of the solution will be machine translation. Translation software has been around for decades with a mediocre track record, but Google’s translation service, Google Translate, is producing impressive results and improving quickly.

“What we do is use hundreds of billions of words that Google infrastructure has access to,” says Michael Galvez, Project Manager at Google Translates. Google’s computers scour the web, suck in all that text, analyze it and learn how people actually write. Google combines that information with high-quality translation transcripts to make a pretty amazing machine translator. Check out this article from a Spanish Newspaper in translated into English. Not bad, eh?

But some language combinations work much better than others and even when the translation’s good, it’s never perfect.

“Google Translate is good at helping you get what is called a gestation or essentially the essence of what the other person is communicating,” says Goolgle’s Michael Galvez.

I’m skeptical that “gestations” will be enough. Much of what we read on the web is written beautifully or full of nuance and software will never be able to translate that. So some translation projects, like a new website called Meedan.net, are still using good ol’ humans.

“The idea is a Wikipedia-style approach to translation,” says Meedan founder Ed Bice. Meedan uses a mix of human and machine translation to present articles, blog posts, and comments about the Middle East in hopes of bridging the gap between the Arabic and English-speaking worlds.

The comments following an article like this one show how the presentation of the translated text will also be an important issue to tackle. Google Translate essentially wipes out the foreign language, showing you web pages only in your language. Meedan instead has the English and Arabic side-by-side. This layout is a valuable addition to the translations themselves when it allows you to see comments bouncing back and forth between languages.

Internet thinkers say both machine translation and human translating projects will continue to improve rapidly over the next decade. Few are eager to predict when, if ever, a Star Trek-style universal translator will emerge. But as more and more of the web moves away from English, I have feeling we’ll be using more and more of these services. After all, 73 percent of the Internet right now is not in English.

Posted via web from bookaman's posterous

Apple Didn't Kill Flash, HTML5 Did

The battle over Flash and its role (or lack thereof) on the iPhone came to a head today when Apple CEO Steve Jobs published an open letter explaining why his company won’t support Flash on the iPhone, iPod touch and iPad.

Adobe CEO Shantanu Narayen spoke with The Wall Street Journal to deliver his response. Unsurprisingly, the arguments from both parties are self-serving in parts and gloss over some realities.

It’s time to cut through the BS and, in turn, determine what the Apple-Adobe feud means for consumers and developers.

H.264 Rules Web Video, Not Flash

For most end-users, the debate over Flash is largely a debate about web video. Yes, Flash is used in other ways — for web-based games and ever-decreasingly in website design — but thanks in large part to YouTube, Flash is most commonly associated with web video.

In his letter, Steve Jobs highlights a point that I have made myself on many occasions: Web video is overwhelmingly encoded in H.264. Not only is the H.264 codec the default encoding setting for practically every video service online, it is also by and large the default codec for raw video from digital video cameras. That means that if you upload video from your Flip camera directly to YouTube, it doesn’t have to convert that video into a new format, which requires more time and resources.

Adobe started to support H.264 back in 2007, essentially buying Flash time as a video container without forcing video services like YouTube to transcode the native H.264 video into something else that Flash could use.

HTML5 Is the Best Way to Deliver Video on Mobile

The problem for Flash isn’t that it can’t adapt to contain other types of video; it is that software and hardware, particularly on the mobile side, have moved in a direction that natively supports the playback of H.264 content. Why bother using a container if you can play the file natively and get the memory advantages of not having a container plus hardware optimization?

Even on devices that support Flash Lite, the video experience is almost always optimized for H.264. HTML5 just makes the process easier to integrate across multiple platforms. While the proprietary and licensed nature of H.264 has turned some browser makers away from supporting H.264 in the HTML5 video standard (Mozilla and Opera are the most vocal opponents), mobile devices that already have it licensed by hardware vendors are going to use the technology. The quality, player experience and even live stream and ad insertion abilities of HTML5 are expanding all the time as well.

Look at the Sublime Player demo from Jilion for a great example of what can be done with HTML5 and web video. SublimeVideo is working on a solution that will serve HTML5 video by default in mobile browsers, Safari, Google Chrome and Internet Explorer 9, and serve Flash video by default in browsers such as Firefox and Opera.

The fact that so many web video providers are working to embrace HTML5 isn’t because Apple doesn’t support Flash, but because it is the best way to deliver video to all smartphone users. With or without Apple, the shift to native playback is where web video is headed.

Flash Hasn’t Proven Itself on Mobile

Even if you completely disagree with Apple’s position on Flash, the reality is this: Flash has not proven itself on mobile platforms. Specialized systems like Popbox, the new TiVo Premiere and some other embedded iTV systems aside, as a technology Flash has existed almost solely in the desktop browser.

Flash 10.1 is supposed to be the first version of Flash that will actually ship on a number of mobile phones in a way that is more than just Flash Lite. Flash Lite, which is the current implementation that some Windows Mobile and Android phones support, is not a great experience. It doesn’t have hardware acceleration and is limited in terms of what types of content it can support.

Adobe claims that Flash will be shipping on supported devices later this summer, but at this point, I’ll believe it when I see it. It also looks like the minimum requirements are going to be the equivalent of what the Nexus One offers, meaning it will only be available on the high end of the smartphone market, not the mid or low-end. The promise of Flash on mobile devices has been long in the making, but aside from demonstrations, it hasn’t happened.

Flash on Mobile Has Issues

Even on hardware that is supposed to support Flash, Flash is often not included. For instance, when Firefox Mobile was released for the Nokia N900, Flash support was removed at the last minute. Why? Because it wasn’t a good experience.

Even on Intel’s Atom platform, Flash has issues. This is why playing back fullscreen Hulu or HD YouTube clips is often painful on a netbook (even an ION or Tegra netbook). Again, Flash 10.1 is supposed to bring hardware acceleration that will make those types of processors handle video in more robust ways, but frankly, when there are still longstanding issues with Flash on x86 computers, how can we expect the transition to mobile to be problem free?

This isn’t to say Flash couldn’t become a killer, hardware optimized superb mobile platform — but at this stage, everything that Flash is so good at doing on the desktop isn’t happening with Flash on mobile devices. Rather than defend Flash’s performance on mobile devices with words, I’d much rather have Adobe actually release working products that show off why the technology can work well across platforms, including mobile.

One Size Never Fits All

It’s nice to get caught up in the fantasy of building an application that can be deployed on any type of device and work the same way across the board. Sun Microsystems called this “write once, run anywhere,” and it was the defacto slogan for Java. However, as anyone who has ever actually written for Java knows, the differences in Java virtual machines (JVM) means that that in practice, it can often take more time to try to debug a solution and get it working on another platform than it would to just write it natively for that platform.

Web applications are actually the closest example of “write once, run anywhere” actually working. Even then, browsers still need to be optimized for specific platforms in order to run applications built using web languages. This is one reason why native application building for smartphones has become so popular: native applications usually offer a better experience than simply using the web.

It’s fine to aspire for solutions that will work well across a variety of platforms, but users need to continue to be aware of the technological realities that prevent that from happening. If nothing else, the Apple-Adobe debate highlights that computer software — web based or otherwise — is not one size fits all.

Posted via web from bookaman's posterous

Thursday, April 29, 2010

On Twitter, It's Just Five Degrees of Separation

On Twitter, there are just five degrees of separation between you and almost everybody else on the service. After analyzing over 5.2 billion friend and follower relationships on Twitter, social media analytics and monitoring firm Sysomos determined that nearly everyone on Twitter is just five steps away from each other and about half of all the people on Twitter are separated by only four steps.

The famous six degrees of separation also still hold true on Twitter. These six steps cover 98% of all Twitter friendships. The most common friendship distance on Twitter, however, is just 4.67 and if you visit all of your friends and friends of friends up to a distance of five steps, chances are that you will see about 83% of all Twitter users.

six degrees of separation twitter

The Power of Retweets

This also highlights the power of retweets. A retweet really doesn't have to propagate very far to reach a very large number of people. Of course, chances are that not all of your friends and friends of friends will retweet your message - and even then, appearing in a Twitter user's stream doesn't guarantee that your message will actually be seen.

The Sysomos team also looked at how far Twitter users would have to roam to meet a follower of their own. According to the company's data, it only takes 3.32 steps on average (standard deviation is 1.25 steps) before you will find someone who is already following you. As Sysomos' Alex Cheng notes in the report, this means that "there are many small, circular connections on Twitter."

twitter reachability sysomos

Posted via web from bookaman's posterous

How Microsoft Tracks Down Pirates

Each new iteration of Microsoft software also marks a new chapter in the ongoing cat-and-mouse game between software counterfeiters and Microsoft's own enforcement team.

Like paper currency, Microsoft employs a variety of techniques to assure customers that the software discs they're buying are valid. And rings of cybercriminals, in turn, make every attempt to defeat those safeguards.

"All of our most popular products are counterfeited," said Zoe Krumm, a senior business intelligence analyst with Microsoft. "Windows 7 was counterfeited within a month or so of us launching, with a very deceptive passoff."

In 2007, Microsoft and the FBI, in conjunction with Chinese local law enforcement, tracked down and raided a piracy organization suspected of producing $2 billion worth of counterfeit software. Microsoft recently revealed one of the techniques used by the company to prove that piracy: "fingerprints" left by CD duplicators. In an interview late last week, Microsoft offered even more details on this technique, plus others, that its team of investigators uses.

Microsoft maintains a 75-person staff of antipiracy investigators, consisting of paralegals, forensic intelligence analysts, investigators, and other staff, many with backgrounds in law enforcement, according to Bonnie MacNaughton, a senior attorney in Microsoft's antipiracy enforcement efforts and a federal prosecutor for 14 years before that. Senior business intelligence analysts are placed in all geographic regions. In Seattle, for example, Microsoft has hired former members of the Seattle police department, and the lead investigator in Europe previously worked for Interpol.

It's worth noting that there are two types of pirates: consumers who knowingly purchase pirated software in the hopes of avoiding the paying of licensing fees or premiums, and those that think they're buying the genuine article, perhaps at a discount. In both cases, users can be notified that their software is fake via its Genuine Advantage program, which was extended to a total of 41 countries in 2009. Chinese case, as well as one that Microsoft participated in India in Dec. 2009, were designed to deceive consumers. All told, Microsoft has received almost 30,000 reports concerning vendors that have victimized customers.

And those consumers can be Microsoft's best ally. In 2009, customers provided just under 80,000 leads to suspected pirates, for a historical total of about 280,000; 65 percent provided comments, and a significant percentage are willing to work with the company. "We didn't work as closely with our customers as we have begun to do today," MacNaughton said about early anti-counterfeit operations.

Microsoft also works closely with agencies such as the Business Software Alliance, which in a 2008 study with IDC estimated that approximately $53 billion is lost to piracy each year. Another 2008 IDC study claimed that a 10 percent drop in piracy would add 600,000 jobs to the world economy. Other studies have tied pirated software to the rise of botnets in a given region.

"They're not pie-in-the-sky estimates, but reasonable estimates of the extent of losses," MacNaughton said.

The most obvious deterrent is the product key, part of the certificate of authenticity (COA) that Microsoft provides with every disc. If the key doesn't work, customers start asking questions. (Microsoft provides a telephone hotline, (800) RU-LEGIT (785-3448), for that purpose. Other examples of counterfeit software can be seen at Microsoft's anti-piracy Web site.)

That hasn't stopped snatch-and-grab operations, such as a recent case in a border town in Mexico, where a truckload of COAs was hijacked. Both the driver and the security guard stopped for fuel, when robbers pulled up, held the two men at gunpoint, and made off with the documents. But when the theft was reported, Microsoft tracked down the COA keys and simply "turned them off," assigning them to a list of banned keys.

And don't think that paying the correct price is a sign of authenticity, either.

"We don't really use pricing as a red flag because we have seen syndicates price just at or under cost," Krumm said, perhaps to recoup the cost of their criminal R&D.

So how does a global organization like Microsoft, tracking criminals in more than 150 countries, actually make its cases?

Tools of the trade

One of the means of tracking physical discs is to actually examine the minute defects a CD-ROM stamper creates as it presses the discs. These pits, grooves, or other defects can be scanned and placed into a database, to help track the spread of physical discs across the globe, Krumm said. (See the accompanying slideshow for more.)

Each unique disc stamp is called a "strain"; Microsoft has tracked over 580,000 throughout the world. When a disc's "fingerprints" are matched to a database that Microsoft maintains, the disc's origin can be linked to a particular facility, which could be tied to a piracy operation. Tracking the discs allows Microsoft and investigators to build "intelligent maps" of a piracy operation and its distribution methods.

"We can understand the life of a stamper," Krumm said. "We know how long they last, and when the end-of-life begins at a stamper facility."

Microsoft has also begun building out an "action mapping tool," which it will provide to local law enforcement. Layers on top of Bing maps of a given area, such as Southern California, can track cease-and-desist letters, civil and criminal suits and seizures, and other metrics to provide visual clues of piracy hotspots.

Microsoft also embeds security features into its discs and packaging to foil pirates, who can spend a great deal of time to try and foil them.

Microsoft's chief weapon is embedding hard-to-copy security features directly into the disc itself, such as an embedded hologram of the Windows logo. Pirates, however, typically affix a hologram sticker to the front of the disc, and replicate the design of the Windows or Office disc with a sophisticated – but removable – peel-off label. Microsoft also designs the holograms so that they shift and move when the disc is rotated, Krumm said.

A second security feature is the use of an actual embedded thread, which is added to the "genuine" paper Microsoft uses to print its COAs at the point of manufacturing, Krumm said. The thread is used to distinguish the real article. Pirates typically simulate the thread, printing it instead of embedding them.

Counterfeiters fight back

In some cases, however, pirates have been willing to go almost as far as Microsoft has to establish authenticity. In 2007, a major syndicate headquartered in southern China was accused of distributing $2 billion of Microsoft software, including fake versions of thirteen Microsoft products, including Windows Vista, Microsoft Office, and Windows XP, in at least eight languages. Software worth $500 million was actually recovered. The six-year investigation, including evidence gathered from 1,000 customers and partners, culminated in the 11 ringleaders receiving prison sentences.

"They were responsible for the most convincing simulation we've seen," Krumm said.

The pirates printed five separate layers of labels onto the discs itself, trying to duplicate the shifting holograms that Microsoft had added, Krumm said. Actual thread was woven into the COAs, in an attempt to duplicate the real article. Using the CD stamper tool Microsoft developed, Chinese authorities tracked down the manufacturing operation. When they did so, Microsoft discovered a shocking fact: the counterfeiters had a larger manufacturing operation than Microsoft's own in the Europe, Middle East, and Asia (EMEA) region.

"We found enough thread on site to make over a million COAs," Krumm said.

In December 2009, the largest counterfeiting operation in India was cracked, with $2 million of counterfeit software recovered at the scene, MacNaughton said. Microsoft estimated that the counterfeiter controlled more than 56 percent of India's OEM software market.

"Sometimes, what happens is that [counterfeit or stolen] product keys don't work; a lot of times they don't work," Krumm said. "The reseller understood that problem, and wanted to create COAs with actual keys."

The reseller purchased counterfeit COAs from China, then obtained the keys via fraud, and added them to his own counterfeits. The technique was so successful that investigators were fooled until the fraudulent keys were tied to the fake COAs.

Meanwhile, Microsoft has also making available its software for download, and "where legal businesses go," criminals will follow," MacNaughton said. In 2009, Hong Lei, the creator of the downloadable "Tomato Garden Windows XP" software, was jailed for three and a half years. Millions of Internet users had free access to the software on a website, tomatolei.com, after Lei stripped protections from the Microsoft software.

Microsoft has seen upticks in counterfeit code hacks to bypass security measures, and cyber criminals have begun publishing sophisticated and authentic Web sites posing as legitimate resellers, and seeking to lure buyers into divulging credit-card information, Krumm said.

"We've really increased the skill set on that [online piracy] team," Krumm said. "And we spend even more time expecting it not that cloud services are such a critical component of Microsoft's strategy."

Krumm said she expects that criminals will eventually create "dark clouds," replicating the legal Web-based cloud services that Microsoft and other companies will provide.

"At the highest level, counterfeiters keep raising the bar because they have to," MacNaughton said. "In 2001, it honestly wasn't that difficult to counterfeit a decent passoff of our products. As time has passed, however, it has narrowed the number of people and the organizations' ability to counterfeit these products."

Posted via web from bookaman's posterous

Wednesday, April 28, 2010

Why Schools are Turning to Google Apps

Today, the entire public school system of Oregon will embrace Google Apps. 400,000 Students, teachers, and administrators will have access to a common e-mail and chat system, cloud-based collaboration tools, and a robust multimedia streaming service. Traditionally, statewide adoptions of any kind in education are hotly contested, with the most minute details up for extended debate.

But the case for Google Apps in education is compelling in many ways. We interviewed the architects of this plan, as well as others who use in the classroom, and we’ve highlighted the three major benefits: 1) It saves schools money; 2) It boosts academic performance and motivation, and; 3) It prepares students for digital communication in the real world.

Saving Money

Money is often the top issue when it comes to educational reform, and the outlook for Google Apps is certainly good. The Oregon Department of Education estimates a savings of $1.5 million per year. Even the relatively humble Maine Township District 207 in Illinois, another school system that currently utilizes Google Apps, estimates their savings to be an impressive $160,000 each year.

Google Apps for educational institutions is free. The savings largely come from the replacement of legacy e-mail systems and desktop office application suites, and these figures include the associated costs of IT support and infrastructure upgrades. For Steve Nelson, Technology of Director of Oregon Virtual Schools, these savings allow the state to provide multimedia streaming services that support student-generated content, which he says was “not economically feasible” without Google.

Henry Thiele, IT director for District 207 says he is “surprised by how many schools don’t even know that [Google apps] is there.” And, when they hear about the opportunity, says, Thiele, they’re curious to know “what the catch is.” Thiele simply responds, “There is no catch.”

Boosting Student Motivation and Performance

“Our students involved in this program are increasing their reading ability at rates faster than anything we’ve seen before,” says Thiele. He is referring to an English course which pairs high-risk 9th graders with their own laptop. District 207 expects an average gain of three points on reading tests over the course of the year, and observes that at-risk students’ scores typically either stay stagnant, or fall behind. For those in this program, scores have skyrocketed between 8 and 10 points. While Google Apps alone was not the only factor in raising test scores, its low cost and collaborative nature made the 1-to-1 curriculum possible.

Principal Jason Levy, who helped usher in Google Apps for New York’s Intermediate School 339 that 47% of students now perform at grade level for math, up from 27%. Additionally, both Thiele and Levy observe greater focus and fewer disciplinary problems. “Behavior has improved, attendance is higher, and suspension levels have fallen,” reports Levy.

Both educators’ observations are par for the course, as other classroom experiments confirm that technology in education helps to boost student interest.

It’s not hard to understand why. “People talk a lot about kids — that they can’t focus and sustain their concentration. Well, neither can I,” admits Levy. Embracing children’s need to be social, combined with their rapid adoption of technology, is an organic way to work with the grain of human curiosity.

Preparation for the Real World

In addition to the obvious benefits of collaboration and familiarity with technology, Google Apps is helping to prepare students for the outside world in some innovative ways. At Notre Dame, for instance, Engineering students keep a running e-portfolio of the classroom projects with Google Sites. The digital accumulation of their college efforts will likely mean more to future employers than the bullet points on a resume.

A Maine Township teacher is using Google Spreadsheets to free the science classroom from the confines of the textbook. Students conduct actual experiments and code the data in collaborative online tables. In this instance, students get their hands dirty, literally, by measuring plant growth in various soil types, and analyzing the data using digital tools, just as a real scientist would. This common sense model seems like an inexpensive and engaging way to help the Department of Education meet its goal of increasing U.S. scientific competitiveness, as outlined in the ambitious “Race to the Top” agenda.

Conclusion

“The enhanced functionality is absolutely staggering,” gushes Nelson. Indeed, every one of my interviewees had nothing but positive reviews of Google Apps in an educational context. Regardless of what one may think of Google as a company, its contributions to the American education system are certainly noteworthy.

That more school districts are starting to adopt Google Apps for use in the classroom is in many ways an affirmation of the broader cloud computing model in enterprise settings. The increasing maturity of these tools, paired with significant cost savings, makes web apps attractive to cash-strapped school departments. The Oregon decision to adopt Google Apps across its entire school system is perhaps a harbinger of a more cloud-based future for education.

Posted via web from bookaman's posterous

Oregon First To Go Statewide With Google Apps For Education

The state of Oregon's Department of Education is opening the option for any school in the state to use Google Apps for Education, a free service that gives K-12 schools access to the application suite.

Oregon is the first state to take advantage of the program. The estimated statewide cost savings for school districts using Google Apps for Education is about $1.5 million a year for email. As the OS is in the browser, other cost savings are expected in reduced hardware and software upgrades.

"Google Apps for Education is free. We plan to keep the core offering of Google Apps Education Edition free. This includes user accounts for incoming students in the future. As you may know, Google was founded by a research project at Stanford University, and this is just one way we can give back to the educational community."

For now the service includes filtered email; calendar; online documents; video conferencing and web site development. The advertisement-free service gives school districts their own domain that can be managed through IT. School staff controls the amount and type of email messages allowed in the system.

A spokesperson said "what could be outside the core are extra Postini services like Google Message Discovery that schools might want to purchase (at 66% discount) if they have special email archiving needs. Google Message Security (the other Postini-driven add on) is free for K-12 schools that sign up now but isn't a part of Apps and thus is probably what they mean by outside the core. "

Google Sites, by itself, is reason enough for this to be valuable for schools. Its collaborative aspects make it an asset that can be used for projects, school web sites and as an internal communication network.

Both Google and Microsoft are making a big push into government and school systems.

The topic became of national interest last October when the city of Los Angeles decided to standardize on GMail.

Posted via web from bookaman's posterous

Monday, April 26, 2010

Eric Whitacre's Virtual Choir - 'Lux Aurumque'

With the help of 250 videos submitted to Youtube, a virtual 3D Choir was born. Eric Whitacres is an American composer and conductor, using his blog and Facebook page he assembled and auditioned singers for his piece called ‘Lux Aurumque’. He distributed his sheet music online so people can sing specific parts. He then collected all the videos that were submitted, edited it, and then put it all together to make an amazing sounding and looking choir.

Posted via web from bookaman's posterous

Sunday, April 25, 2010

Political Use of Twitter and Social Media in Venezuela

From the April 20th 2010 BBC Digital Planet podcast.

Posted via email from bookaman's posterous

How Facebook's Newest Feature Could Change the Internet

Did Facebook just conquer the Web?

Once a mere online yearbook, Facebook has recently grown to become the most trafficked domain on the Internet. But that was just the prelude. The next chapter starts this week, with Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg announcing a new application that could plant Facebook plug-ins on every square inch of the Internet and let publishers share and collect the public data of each user.  "Facebook is basically going to be the Web," wrote Slate tech columnist Farhad Manjoo on Twitter.

Here's the change you'll notice: websites like Yelp and Slate and CNN will start dropping social "plug-ins" -- little Facebook widgets -- into their sites. This way, you can see what your friends have read and liked. As Slate's editor David Plotz explained in a note to readers, "just press the Facebook 'Like' button at the bottom of any story, add a comment if you want, and approve it: A post saying that you have 'Liked' the story will appear on your Facebook wall and as part of your news feed." If that doesn't sound terribly revolutionary, it's because it isn't. Plug-ins for other social media sites like Digg already exist on many websites.

But wait, there's more.

Facebook will allow website developers to collect and use our information when we connect to a site. When I press the "like" button, that goes into social clearinghouse of information. Other sites can see the articles I like on CNN, the music I like on Pandora, the food I like on Yelp ... and that's in addition to any information I make public on my Facebook profile. The Facebook team calls this application "Open Graph." You can call it the future of marketing.

What does this mean for privacy? Open Graph initially sounds pretty invasive. But remember that everything that flows into this reservoir of content is already public. Facebook's new policy doesn't make your private information public. It makes your public information a lot more public. Content that was once between you and your pal's news feed is now playing all your friends' CNN Facebook plug-ins and sloshing around in a matrix of information. "Public no longer means public on Facebook," says Mashable's Christina Warren. "It means public in the Facebook ecosystem. My advice to you: Be aware of your privacy settings."

What does it mean for websites and advertisers? That's the billion-dollar question. For now, the honest thing is to say we don't know. The Facebook ecosystem will run on a living, breathing semantic memory of its users' likes. Sounds like an ad goldmine. Maybe this could pave the way toward true targeted advertising: browsing CNN on my smart phone in Dupont, a mobile ad pops up with a happy hour coupon for a restaurant I said I liked on Yelp. Or imagine a better news aggregation site: a waterfall of links with all of the articles "liked" by friends who self-identify as conservative on Facebook. Facebook search engine? It's not out of the question.

Facebook, I once wrote, is a bit like a Middle Eastern country sitting on top of an ocean of oil. But instead of oil, it holds information. Facebook feels a business-driven pressure to let outsiders (ad companies) drill deep into its reserves to learn about our music and activities and news-reading habit, so they can shove Coldplay tickets in front of Coldplay fans and job listings in front of college seniors, and so forth. Open Graph is a step in that direction.

Zuckerberg thinks public information is the new "social norm." So he assumes we do, as well. But most Americans are pretty jealous about their private information. That's precisely why the nation erupted in apoplectic howling when our photos and numbers were suddenly upchucked onto the World Wide Web as Facebook purged regional networks. That anger will only be magnified if we suspect that advertisers are pooling our public information in the name of "customizing user experience."

Facebook envisions the Internet as a fundamentally, inescapably social experience. That's Zuckerberg's vision. The question is, will we like it?

Posted via web from bookaman's posterous

You, your doctor and the Internet

Should a caregiver ever Google a patient? Would you ask your physician to be a Facebook ‘friend’? Ethical questions abound, and the doctor-patient relationship is at stake.

You've just started treatment with a new psychiatrist, whom you like very much. Should you "friend" her on Facebook?

If she says yes, what if she finds those pictures of you dancing drunkenly with the lampshade on your head — after you told her you don't drink anymore? Or what if you discover pictures of her snuggled up with her husband and two adorable kids, when the reason you went into therapy in the first place was that you're sad about being single and childless?

If she doesn't respond, will you feel rejected, distanced, hurt?

And what about using search engines such as Google and Yahoo? What if your shrink Googles you to see if you're delusional or if you really are that famous astronaut you claim to be? What if she discovers that you have a posh address even though you pleaded for reduced fees? If she does Google you, should she tell you? If so, before or after? Should the search results go into your medical record?

One of the newest medical ethics dilemmas is the collision between the Internet and the traditionally strict boundaries between patients and doctors. Caregivers, especially psychiatrists and therapists, have historically disclosed personal information only when it might benefit a patient — as when a patient is struggling with the loss of a child and the therapist discloses that he, too, has experienced such a loss.

Likewise, patients have typically disclosed personal details in their own time, as therapy continues and trust develops. The Web challenges that model head-on.

Facebook, founded in February 2004, now has more than 400 million active users. MySpace, founded a month earlier, has 100 million. Google.com, the search engine founded in 1998, currently handles 100 billion searches per day.

There's no question that Internet searches can be an important tool for healthcare consumers. "Patients should Google their doctors, to check on credentials, training, scholarly articles and the like," says Dr. Daniel Sands, the senior medical director of clinical informatics for the Internet Business Solutions Group at networking giant Cisco Systems.

But what about the reverse — doctors searching patients? "Why would they ever want to?" asks Sands, also a physician at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston.

When it's OK to search

There may be times when it's appropriate for doctors to Google patients, says psychiatrist Benjamin Silverman, chief resident of the McLean Hospital adult outpatient clinic.

Silverman has a patient who stopped going to therapy without explanation. "I was concerned," he says. "I Googled her."

The patient was not upset, but Silverman felt he had crossed some kind of boundary. So he told her. "If we were going to continue treatment," he says, "I thought it was necessary for her to know that I had done this."

Other situations may justify an Internet search or a visit to the patient's social networking site as well, says Dr. David H. Brendel, an assistant professor of psychiatry at McLean. Maybe a psychiatrist suspects a patient has suicide plans, for example.

But doctors should ask themselves some hard questions before doing so, to be sure they are not just being voyeuristic.

"There are huge benefits to social networking," says Sands, but once you put information on such a site, "you are letting someone into your kimono, so you've got to be mindful about what's there."

And that goes both ways. Without revealing specifics, Brendel recalls a case in which a patient found information on a social networking site that "led to significant discomfort for the physician and the breakdown of their relationship to the point where the patient had to see another doctor."

Of course, Internet users can sign up for varying levels of privacy protection. Doctors can also simply refuse to accept requests from patients to be online friends. But many don't. A study of medical students and residents at the University of Florida in Gainesville, for instance, showed that only 37.5% made their Facebook sites private.

Sawalla Guseh, 25, a third-year student at Harvard Medical School and a Facebook user, says his view of social networking is changing as he goes through school. Two years ago, he says, "I was more, like, it's completely fine, not a big deal" to put his personal information on Facebook.

But when a fellow male medical student was "Facebooked" by a female patient who seemed interested in becoming involved in his personal life, Guseh became more conservative. "Nothing came of [the exchange]," he says, but it made him think. "As we accrue more responsibility… it's more important for us to be a bit more careful about who we friend and who we don't friend," he says.

It's about boundaries

Ultimately, issues of Internet searching and connecting must be judged by the fact that the relationship between a patient and a doctor should be "professional," says Jeffrey E. Barnett, a psychologist at Loyola University Marylandin Baltimore.

Among other things, he says, that means "you have to think carefully about boundaries" and to err on the side of avoiding certain types of "multiple relationships," such as being close social friends, business partners or, in the worst case, sexual partners. Such relationships can in particular threaten the trust that is the foundation of psychotherapy.

Trust would not be violated, on the other hand, if a patient and doctor or therapist sat down together to look at a patient's Facebook site, just as they might discuss photos or poems that a patient brings in. As long as the boundaries are clear, says Barnett, use of social networking sites or Internet searches shouldn't cause problems.

But distinctions can be subtle, says Sonoma, Calif., psychologist Ofer Zur, who discusses ethical issues on his website zurinstitute.com. He posts this advice: "Whether or not accepting the request [of a patient to be an online friend] constitutes a dual relationship depends on what kind of information clients are privy to and the nature of the therapist-client interaction."

As New Hampshire-based cancer survivor Dave deBronkart, who blogs as e-patient Dave about online health, puts it: "I have lots of personal information online, but I am keenly aware of the risks. The Internet is very, very leaky."

Posted via web from bookaman's posterous

Saturday, April 24, 2010

The Architect's Role in a Warming World: Learning from Jamie Lerner

So says Jamie Lerner, a Brazilian architect and former three-term mayor of Curitiba, Brazil, in reference to climate change. Lerner recently gave a lecture at Columbia University called "Sustainable City" in which he explored the role of cities and urban mobility as a response to climate change and as tools for sustainable living. Vishaan Chakrabarti, an architect and professor at Columbia, attended the lecture and wrote about his thoughts in a new a new article on UrbanOmnibus: To LEED is Human; to Lead, Divine. Clearly inspired by Lerner's lecture, Chakrabarti writes that he was reminded "of the architect’s potential role in a warming world."

Chakrabarti argues that architects, planners and developers have a responsibility to "influence the form and mobility, the very morphology, of our cities," to go beyond designing buildings only and wield a broader sword. He calls for a re-emergence of the architect as a leader and power player and points out that "as designers we can lead as others cannot. We are empowered with a holistic understanding of the environment and a project-based education that are ideally suited to the challenges of our day."

And he suggests looking to Lerner as an example of how to successfully lead the design of sustainable urban spaces. As mayor of Curitiba, Lerner promoted city development without neglecting environmental and social factors. His successes are well documented; the efficient public transit network, ingenious waste management system and green spaces preservation program are all legacies of his time in office. The city is also a stellar example of livability.

But what makes Lerner's work so exemplary for designers, according to Chakrabarti, is his "ability to conceptualize scalable solutions to urban mobility and sustainability" with "the logic of design." He writes,

"In Lerner’s world, everything must be smarter, and must use every unit of space and resource with wisdom and clarity. His work continually recognizes that the jump in scale from Curitiba to São Paolo demands a jump in the scale of intervention. Yet in all cases Lerner states unequivocally that the key issue facing a rapidly developing planet is the distance people must travel to get to work – the means by which that distance can be smartly traversed and reduced, he rightly asserts, are the keys to global sustainability...About green buildings, by contrast, he shrugs. Nice, he says, but the real issue is how people move between the buildings."

Changing whole urban systems, and developing more dense, transit supported cities, are all part of building a bright green future. Building on Lerner's example, Chakrabarti envisions designers at all scales working collaboratively to design and build a more sustainable world. To read Chakrabarti's full article, click here.

Posted via web from bookaman's posterous